In re Estate of Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa (Deceased) [2020] eKLR Case Summary

Court
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
L. A. Achode
Judgment Date
September 30, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3
Explore the case summary of In re Estate of Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa (Deceased) [2020] eKLR, detailing key legal arguments and outcomes. Understand its implications in estate law.

Case Brief: In re Estate of Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa (Deceased) [2020] eKLR

1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: In the Matter of the Estate of Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa alias Kasanga Joel Mulwa (Deceased)
- Case Number: Succession Cause No. 959 of 2015
- Court: High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
- Date Delivered: 30th September 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): L. A. Achode
- Country: Kenya

2. Questions Presented:
The court must resolve two primary legal issues: (1) whether the 1st respondent's application for review of a previous ruling meets the threshold for granting review orders; and (2) whether the applicant's request for appointment as a joint administrator and for financial provision from the estate is justified.

3. Facts of the Case:
The parties involved are Mary Agatha Mulwa (the applicant) and Martha Kasanga Mulwa (the 1st respondent), along with Joseph Konzolo Munyao, Sammy Mwendwa Mutavi Muve, and Dr. Andrew Kavulya Muleei (the other respondents). The case centers around the estate of the deceased, Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa. The applicant, claiming to be the first widow of the deceased, filed an objection to a petition for probate initiated by the 2nd to 4th respondents. The applicant alleges intermeddling in the estate by the 1st respondent, who is accused of operating a quarry business and retaining income unlawfully.

4. Procedural History:
The case progressed through various stages, beginning with the filing of an objection to the probate petition in July 2015. A ruling issued on 13th March 2018 dismissed the 1st respondent's previous application for lack of standing. The 1st respondent subsequently filed an application for review on 29th June 2018, which was opposed by the applicant. The applicant also filed a chamber summons on 29th April 2019 seeking her appointment and that of the 1st respondent as joint administrators of the estate and reasonable financial provision.

5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which outlines the grounds for review, including errors apparent on the record and the discovery of new and important matters. It also referenced Section 45 of the Law of Succession Act regarding intermeddling with estate property.
- Case Law: The court cited *Zablon Mokua v Solomon M. Choti and 3 others* [2016] eKLR, emphasizing the need for a review application to demonstrate a clear error on the record. The court also referenced *Pancras T. Swai v Kenya Breweries Limited* Civil Appeal No.275 of 2010 [2014] eKLR, which clarified that review is not a means to appeal erroneous decisions on points of law.
- Application: The court found that the 1st respondent's application for review did not satisfy the criteria for review as it primarily raised issues that were grounds for appeal rather than errors apparent on the record. The court also concluded that the applicant had not sufficiently demonstrated her need for financial provision or the existence of intermeddling by the 1st respondent.

6. Conclusion:
The court dismissed the 1st respondent's application for review, concluding that it lacked merit. The court appointed both the applicant and the 1st respondent as joint administrators of the estate pending the resolution of the objection proceedings. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to procedural rules and the limitations of the review process in civil cases.

7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions noted in the ruling.

8. Summary:
The High Court of Kenya ruled on two applications related to the estate of the deceased Jackson Nicholas Kyengo Mulwa. The court dismissed the 1st respondent's application for review of a previous ruling and appointed both the applicant and the 1st respondent as joint administrators of the estate. This case highlights the complexities involved in succession matters and the legal standards required for review applications, emphasizing the court's role in ensuring fair administration of estates.

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

This is the end of the summary preview.